Supreme Court to Review Challenge to Ban on Distilling Spirits at Home
The Supreme Court has agreed to review a case concerning the constitutionality of a Reconstruction-era ban, enacted over 150 years ago, that prohibits distilling spirits in private homes.
Fresno Visalia, CA, October 19, 2026 —
The Supreme Court has agreed to review a case challenging the constitutionality of a Reconstruction-era ban that prohibits people from distilling spirits in private homes. The law was enacted more than 150 years ago, according to the information available about the case.
The court’s decision to take up the case means it will consider whether the ban is constitutional. The case concerns the law’s prohibition on home distilling; further details about the legal arguments or the circumstances that led to the challenge were not provided.
The names of the parties, the state or jurisdiction involved, and the date of the court’s review were not provided. No information was available about when the court will hear arguments or issue a decision. The specific constitutional provisions at issue were also not identified.
The case places a long-standing restriction on private distilling before the Supreme Court. The available information does not establish whether the court’s review is limited to the law’s application in this case or could affect how the ban is treated more broadly. That question will depend on the case and the court’s eventual ruling, neither of which is described in the summary.
For now, the only confirmed development is that the Supreme Court has agreed to review the constitutional challenge. The ban, as described, continues to prohibit distilling spirits in private homes. No ruling has been reported, and the outcome of the case was not provided.
Story summarized from the original created by MICHAEL KUNZELMAN, Associated Press on www.yourcentralvalley.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
